Frederick Guttmann
In this fourth thesis I explain the story of biblical Genesis in the light of metaphysics and literality, and not starting from the common error of taking the translated text, but starting from the original sources (first, Hebrew and Greek), and not according to not the religious interpretation, but also the scientific interpretation of the archetypes of the mind. But this cannot be achieved correctly without corroborating the information and comparing it with other sources. This is because there are hundreds of other manuscripts from the Hebrew people, many of which also address the creation of the universe.You will not find a story that begins with chaos and an abyss, since that is a later scenario. Things didn’t start out like that. There was already 'something', and from that 'something', made up of other types of kingdoms and worlds, this universe was produced. A primordial, non-physical universe, from which physical universes and their dimensions, like our own, were produced. There was no Big Bang from a specific or unique point. The light burst simultaneously, in terms of cosmic consciousness, although it was experienced at different 'times' due to 'space' (distance). There were not 6 days of creation. There were cycles before that 'light', and 6 eons after that time frame.What does all this story about the so-called 'days' of Genesis (or ’Barashit’) mean? You would be surprised to know that E-Din (Eden) was not a concept originating from the Sumerians, but evokes the kingdoms prior to this universe. Adam (Adam) was not a person, but the human race. Javah (Eve) was not a person, but Life, the daughter of Wisdom and Faith-Certainty. Here you come to understand what all these archetypes that were myths that first occurred in another universe really mean. Yes, that 'snake' was not an animal, but the ego. And everything that is related represents the Collective Mind that produced this universe, which is called Elohim, Adam or Christ, as the case may be.
